#Pokertracker vs holdem manager how to#

Player on the CO: VPIP=26 / PFR=13 / Fold to 3-Bet=65% Even if we get called, we can hit a good flop of low cards or force a fold with a C-Bet.ī) Player in MP: VPIP=14 / PFR=8 / Fold to 3-Bet=55% But if we make a strong re-raise of about 9BB, we achieve the following: first – almost certainly we’ll take the blinds out, second – we put strong pressure on the player in MP, who has an active opponent behind him and also has to act first after the flop, third – we show considerable strength against the player on the CO, who has demonstrated weakness by flat-calling the first bet and also is out of position in the hand. If we just call, we give the blinds good pot odds to play most hands and against 3-4 opponents we’re basically set-mining the flop. The sequence in this hand is interesting because it allows us to make a squeeze play, which increases our folding equity. Player on the CO: VPIP=19 / PFR=11 / Fold to 3-Bet=65%īoth players look like TAGs with reasonable Fold to 3-Bet percentages, although maybe a little higher than I’d recommend. Should we call or re-raise? Let’s look at the stats.Ī) Player in MP: VPIP=22 / PFR=10 / Fold to 3-Bet=74% A player in MP raises 3xBB, a second player on the CO (the cut-off seat) calls and it’s our turn.

#Pokertracker vs holdem manager how to#

In conclusion, calling here is an acceptable play but you should have a plan how to outplay your opponent after the flop.įull ring table, we hold a pair of 9s on the button. In this case you should take into consideration how deeply stacked your opponent is – too aggressive players are often short on chips and present less of a threat.

Don’t forget that this calculation is accurate only in all-in situations with five visible cards, and also the fact that your AQ is not a great hand to play out of position. The range analysis shows calling as marginally profitable in theory.

With the next 3% /77-JJ, AQ/ we tie (55 to 45 in his favor actually) and against the rest about 5% we are ahead 70/30. The top 2,6% /QQ+,AK/ of hands beat us 3 to 1. He seems to 3-Bet the top 11% of his hands. Let’s analyze his possible holdings and see how they compare to our hand. This opponent is a little loose and definitely overly aggressive. We should fold as his probable range has us crushed, but you must be careful if your own Fold to 3-Bet percentage is too high, as observant opponents will try to use your tendencies and 3-Bet you more often. We are up against a TAG player with seemingly established habits in 3-betting with only the best hands. What should we do? Let’s look at the stats. Everyone else folds and the action is back to us. For sake of simplicity we’ll assume all opponents have stacks of about 100BB/įull ring table, we have AQ offsuit in MP and raise 3xBB. On the other hand we have the Fold to 3-Bet stat, which comes in handy when we have to decide whether to re-raise an opponent – especially preflop. You will be amazed how many otherwise good online poker players have a Raise 3-Bet stat of 2,5-3%, which makes them really predictable. Common re-raise range pre-flop is QQ+ and AKo, which corresponds to 2,6% of total hands. Have in mind, that these indicators require much larger sample to be reliable, as the situation occurs less often – don’t even bother looking at them before you have 1000+ hands on the opponent. This poker HUD statistic is most useful during the pre-flop action – then it corresponds only to the possible starting hands and not made ones (for the purpose of clarity: BB is Bet 1, a raise is bet 2 and the re-raise is bet 3). Represents the percentage of times the player re-raised a raiser when they had the opportunity or folded when they faced such a re-raise.